I wanted to go over in particular the reason why the channelling ET and trans-dimensional communication techniques are an improvement over the sky watch practices of CSETI, ESETI and traditional seances.
First lets go over the issues we run into with sky watches and CE-5 experiments. A CE-5 sky watch is an intentional attempt to contact an extraterrestrial intelligence and ask them to fly over the group in a craft or to fly an unmanned probe over the group. When a craft is seen the group signals with lights or requests certain manuevers to confirm the presence of contact with the ETI's flying the craft ( Extraterrestrial intelligence's) Proof is sought using photography and videography, often with IR or night vision equipment. The group then records specific experiences which are believed to be related to secondary contact.
A traditional seance is done much in the same way but proof of presence has a broader scope and can include sounds, apparitions, PK, and other manifestations. The procedure is nearly the same as CE-5. A CE-5 is basically an outdoor seance.
These practices are beneficial I believe. I do not have any problems with doing seances or CE-5's. I enjoy fieldwork and I have been involved in CE-5 since the mid late 1990's.
One problem is the weather. CSETI was formed in warm and reasonably dry climates. In Nova Scotia the primary problem with doing sky watches is that it rains or is foggy very frequently at night. We have 6 months of snow free ground. Of that 6 months 4 months of that presents significant problems with ticks, biting flies and mosquitoes. It leaves very little time to do sky watches with decent weather and without constant bombardment by biting insects. So I was really inspired to formulate an indoor protocol because we just couldn't do anything most of the time but meet indoors and discuss conspiracy which I find rather unfruitful. That's why I started to work on this. The end result, however, I think is actually scientifically superior to an actual sky watch
Scientific studies need a couple characteristics to be considered valid. One they have to be repeatable. That means that I can do something and produce a certain result. I teach someone else and that person can do the same thing and have a similar result.
All of the experiments I've done with this technique have worked for everyone that I have taught it to. All have produced indications in the session data that telepathy has taken place. In one group lesson telepathy between the group members was also very clearly present based on the session data when it was compiled. My numbers are not large but so far the results have been consistent and repeatable.
Second thing that a scientific study would require is that the purpose of the method produce something interesting or useful. In both books, I present case studies which are focused on information related to archaeology, climate science, and healing. The information can be validated though not all aspects have been validated at this time. This is because one of the case studies takes place 200 years into the future. The technique of scrying, dowsing and channelling can be used to obtain real information about alien techniques and technologies. Now advanced technology is somewhat difficult to understand but the ETI's seem to be able to give information that I have been able to process. I have been able to learn their history and how manned interstellar flight was accomplished in two separate civilizations. I learned about their healers and healing cultural practices. I know how to start basic training for both. I believed in this enough to start this training myself learning the same things the ET youth learn as they grow up. I believe that through using this communication technique I've broken the barriers presented by the distance of space and the enigma of energy healing which right now is fairly unreliable as a medical technique and is used only as complimentary practice instead of primary allopathic medicine.
Third characteristic of a scientific study is controls have to be present and play a substantial role in the execution of the experiment.
I use one primary control technique which partially fills the requirement of experimental control. It is that the target or topic of conversation is hidden from the conscious mind of the person doing the work.
In my scrying and channelling books, I present practices for solitary practitioners. This practice is not sufficient however, for scientific studies. But the use of the grab bag is an improvement over traditional practices and introduces a way to do controls in personal practice.
For a strict scientific experimental study, the target or topic of conversation would have to be double blind. That means the target or topic list would not be known to the practitioner until the end of the study. Calibration targets would be included in the mix and probably would be 50%-100% of the contents of the grab bag. The person running the sessions and selecting the targets would also not be aware of the list or which target has been selected. ( hence the term double blind). All targets would have to be verifiable for the sessions to be considered valid.
As far as the practitioner is concerned the double blind techniques used in scientific studies is actually more beneficial. It will essentially eliminate guessing and force greater reliance on telepathy, thus improving the accuracy of the communication.
The use of controls becomes more difficult when judging the session data because links between the target and the content are often symbolic and subjective. However, if the practitioner maintains a high level of integrity and it is understood that the symbolic content can only be interpreted by the practitioner at feedback then I don't think there would be a problem. It presents a far more controlled study than the photographs and videos taken at a sky watch. This technique certain present better control and a higher standard of practice than many of the studies seen today.
Photos and videos today cannot go through a chain of custody during film development as a control. the content is digital and does not require developing. The images can be changed very easily and seamlessly with the right software. This is not acceptable for a scientific study. With the advent of digital photography and videography the validity of visual evidence is gone. So the sky watch while being enjoyable and emotionally satisfying does not provide any substantial evidence that could be used in a credible scientific study. The technique for communication, scrying, dowsing and channelling presented in the books Art of Scrying and Dowsing and Art of Channelling do open a new pathway to controllable, repeatable and useful techniques which could be used in an experimental study.
